 |
| Saraki and Dogara |
Some senators on Saturday demanded
immunity and life pension for presiding officers of the National
Assembly after their tenure in office.
They made the proposals at a-two day
retreat on Constitution Review organised by the Senate Ad Hoc Committee
on Constitution Review in Lagos, the News Agency of Nigeria reports.
The retreat was tagged, ‘Towards Ensuring Governance Accountability in Nigerian federalism.’
According to them, presiding officers,
who should enjoy life pension, are President of the Senate, Deputy
President of Senate, Speaker of the House of Representatives and Deputy
Speaker of House of Representatives.
The lawmakers also said the presiding
officers in the legislature ought to enjoy immunity since the executive
and judiciary are enjoying it.
The Deputy President of the Senate, Sen. Ike Ekweremadu, spoke in favour of the proposal for the pension.
Ekweremadu, who is the Chairman, Senate Ad
hoc Committee on the Review of 1999 Constitution, stressed that it was
necessary for the presiding officers to enjoy such benefits.
He said, “This has nothing to do with an
individual. It is about the institution. Let us not politicise it.
Nobody elected the Chief Justice of Nigeria but he enjoys pension. But
if we cheapen our own institution, so be it. Let us not make this a
personal thing.”
Sen. Stella Oduah (PDP-Anambra) also
said there was no reason why legislators should not enjoy such benefits
when other arms of government enjoyed it.
She said, “The executive enjoy it. Let
us stand by our leaders. They should enjoy this benefit. They act on
behalf of us. They are equal to the executive and judiciary and should
therefore enjoy the same benefit.”
Also, Sen. Ahmed Yerima (APC-Zamfara)
said after being elected by all the lawmakers and their constituencies,
lawmakers should enjoy pension.
“Governors, who spend just four years enjoy it, so presiding officers should enjoy it too,’’ he stated.
However, Leader of the Senate, Sen. Ali Ndume, spoke against the proposal.
According to him, the case of the state governors and their deputies is different as they are elected by the public.
“But we elect our principal officers, to
me, I believe that the benefits of the Office of the Senate President
and other principal officers are too much. They are just one among
equals.
“I am against any excessive privileges
given to the senate president or the speaker. All of us were elected. If
we are doing anything, it should be for all members of the National
Assembly,” Ndume said.
Also, the Senate Minority Leader, Sen. Godswill Akpabio, opposed the suggestion.
He said, “The governor of a state and
the president cannot stay in office for more than two terms. But a
senator can stay in office for 35 years.”
In her submission, Sen. Oluremi Tinubu of the APC, who represents Lagos-Central, stated that principal officers had had enough.
“Principal Officers drive fleet of cars
and they have other entitlements. They should not earn extra money when
they leave office.
“In the last (8th) assembly, we in the
minority tried to raise our voice against it. You are first, second and
third among equals. Some of us do not even have cars but principal
officers have so many. I think we should drop that idea,” she said
On immunity clause for principal
officers of the federal legislature, 21 lawmakers voted for it favour
while 15 voted against it, NAN reports.
The Chairman, Senate Committee on Works,
Kabiru Gaya, said the essence of immunity was to guard some public
office holders against any form of distraction while discharging their
duties.
He said, “There are three tiers of
government and only two arms enjoy immunity. See what is happening to
the President of the Senate now (Bukola Saraki, who is standing trial at
the Code of Conduct Tribunal for alleged false declaration of assets).
“We are not saying the case in court
should be stopped. But even yesterday, we read in the papers that there
is a fresh case of forgery of Senate Standing Rule against the presiding
officers and some other persons and all is to destabilise us.’’
Ndume also supported the proposal for
immunity for all presiding officers of the National Assembly. He however
argued that such immunity should be limited to civil offences committed
by the officers.
“For criminal issues (offences), there
should be no immunity, but for civil offences, there should be immunity.
Whoever it is that is involved in a criminal matter should be
prosecuted,’’ he noted.
In his submission, Akpabio proposed that
all National Assembly members and state Houses of Assembly members
should have immunity.
He said elected officers, who were
saddled with the responsibility of ensuring good governance, should be
allowed to carry out their functions without any form of interference.
Akpabio said, “I propose that all
principal officers of the House of Assembly, House of Representatives
and Senate, should enjoy immunity like the executive. So, all
parliamentarians who have criminal cases can be investigated but they should
serve their punishment after office.”
However, the Deputy Senate Leader, Bala
Ibn N’Allah, argued that Nigerians might misconstrue the proposal for
immunity for the legislature to mean that they were arrogating so much
power to themselves.
He suggested total removal of immunity
from all arms of government, saying, “Let us remove immunity from
everyone and let there be balance. If you give immunity to everybody, a
legislator may rape a lady and wait to finish his tenure before being
prosecuted because he has immunity.”
At the retreat, the federal lawmakers agreed on rotation of governorship positions among different ethnic groups in states.
They arrived at the consensus, with 15 lawmakers voting in favour of the proposal and seven voted against it.
The lawmakers also proposed that
independent candidates should be allowed to vie for political offices
and voted against Diaspora voting.
Similarly, the senators voted against the continuous operation of joint account between the local and state governments.
After a poll on the proposal, 24
lawmakers voted in favour of financial autonomy for local governments,
while six lawmakers supported the continuation of the joint account.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
PLEASE BE POLITE