 |
| Abimbola Adelakun |
When the Ogun State Police arrested Joe
Chinakwe after his neighbour reported him for naming his dog “Alhaji
Buhari”, and for walking the same dog in their “Hausa dominated
neighbourhood,” they did not try to mask why they took that line of
action. According to media reports, they charged him to court because
his “provocative” act could cause a breach of peace, and that was
because “an average Northerner would feel bad over such a thing.”
Underlining their motive is the reality of our socio-political
environment. When law enforcement admits to arresting a man to preserve
the feelings of his accusers who can launch gratuitous violence, they
mean the evil we are dealing with surpasses their level of efficiency.
History has taught us that whenever the
“average northerner” says he “feels bad over a thing”, the rest of us
are supposed to hurriedly rearrange our manners. We are told to take
heed of invisible limits that “infidels” are not permitted to cross.
Alarmingly, a number of us have restricted ourselves to this
emasculating avoidance of wrath. We have mapped out “no-go areas” of
public discussion that we trespass at grievous risks to ourselves. We
have seen the repercussions of trespassing these bounds and they are not
pleasant. From Gideon Akaluka’s killings to the Reinhard Bonnke crusade
violence, the Miss World riots, the Danish cartoons saga, and many
other instances of unwarranted violence that have occurred, we have long
realised we are dealing with a short-tempered evil spirit who demands a
sacrifice of our collective dignity so he can let us live.
The trouble is that this evil spirit of
violence who has a chokehold on our society is implacable. He has tasted
vats of blood of the innocent and assumed a proprietary right over our
lives. Violence in Nigeria happens, not because of intrepid and
insensitive people who say things that make others feel bad. Rather,
they stem from a cultivated attitude of those who think others’ lives
are theirs to take, and they have no regard for any law that attempts to
restrain their execution of mindless violence.
Otherwise, what did anyone say or do
that warranted the post-election violence of 2011? What did a simple
exchange between Mrs. Bridget Agbahime and them result in her death?
What of the four killed in Niger State in May? What of the eight burnt
to death in Zamfara State just three days ago? Who thinks their victims,
people who live in close proximity with them, did not know not to upset
them? So why did they still end up dead? Is it not because the state,
by never redressing these incidents of violence, has indulged the idea
that whoever makes them feel bad deserves what it gets?
Rather than challenge those murderers
when they resort to meaningless violence over some offense, Nigerian
leaders have blamed the victims instead. When Mrs. Agbahime was killed
in Kano, the Presidency issued a press release that suggested people
should know better than do things that make these killers feel bad. Over
the years, religious and political elite have imbibed the language of
justifying violence and it feels very natural when they express certain
worrisome ideas. For instance, a man goes to the police station to
report a neighbour who supposedly named his dog after his father and
certain well-meaning Nigerians say, “At least he tried. You know what
would have happened if it had been Kano or Kaduna?” That kind of
thinking is dangerous because it suggests that these murderers are
ferocious beasts whose raw sensitivity needs to be larded with our
self-restraint. Since they cannot be tamed, the rest of us had better
put ourselves in a cage so we do not get bitten. Whereas they are
savages precisely because Nigeria has failed to tame them.
Whether “Trader Joe” was right (or not)
to have named his dog “Alhaji Buhari” is an open argument that would be
moderated by cultural and religious sensibilities. What is far more
important is for the law enforcement not to react based on fear and
curtail another man’s freedom. We cannot claim to live in a free society
if the best we do is contain ourselves out of fear of what certain
rogue elements can do to us. Freedom is not freedom if its limits are
not tested every now and then. It is up to the law to enforce its
legitimacy without merely pandering to malevolent threats.
In the account of the incident, those
who lodged the claim against “Trader Joe” threatened to kill him if he
returned home. Now, if the police arrested the man due to the threat of
violence his action could have caused, why then did they overlook the
threat of violence to his life? Why is the threat of violence Chinakwe’s
traducers could have caused against the entire society considered more
egregious than the one they threatened against him as an individual?
If Chinakwe truly named his dog
President Muhammudu Buhari as he claimed, and it matters less whether
his motive was admiration or disrespect, then arresting him would be
setting a bad precedent. There is no one who is, or seeks to be
president in the age of social media – where the distance between
people’s sometimes unrefined thoughts and their fingers on their mobile
devices grows shorter everyday- who will not suffer harassment from the
populace. Former Goodluck Jonathan endured so much insult -from ethnic
slurs to malicious wishes against himself and his family- such that at
some point he labelled himself the most criticised president in Nigerian
history. At no point did his rabid followers ask anyone to be arrested
because they “felt bad” about the insults to their hero. President
Barack Obama and his family suffered some of the most vitriolic insults
any American First Family president has ever received but the sky did
not collapse on anyone’s head.
The Republican contender for the US
presidency, Donald Trump, is not yet president (and he may never be) but
he already deals with similar insults hauled at him from various
corners of his country. Lately, some artists put up nude statues of him
in five busy cities depicting him in the most inelegant manner. People
have virulently protested such distressful artistic expressions but that
is as far as it goes. In universities this fall, Trump’s nude statue
will be a topic of discussions in classroom as people try to give a
philosophical slant to the artist who has “disrobed patriarchy”,
“undressed male white hegemonic power” and laid bare the libidinal
energy that the oppressor has used to keep the rest of the society
subjugated.
Do we imagine that these societies
attained such level of restraint overnight? No, it is an attitude that
is bred into people and sustained with the state’s efficient judicial
structures. As a matter of fact, the various social crises erupting in a
place like the US should teach us that what is called civilisation is
not a destination but a journey. Every country faces the possibility of
regression to its Hobbesian state; their citizens just do not let it
happen.
Ogun State Police can go ahead and
convince themselves they acted in the best interest of the state, that
they arrested “Trader Joe” to protect him from the marauders who wanted a
taste of his blood, and that he needs to be seen to be punished by his
would-be killers. Eventually, they will realise that this evil trait
cannot be appeased. When he is thirsty for blood, he simply goes for it
because the Nigerian state has let him get away with it too many times.
The police should know that the fear of the killers’ petulance is not
the beginning of wisdom, it is the very definition of moral cowardice.
Source: Punch
0 comments:
Post a Comment
PLEASE BE POLITE